<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Seo Company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seogenesis.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seogenesis.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google owning the mobile market</title>
		<link>http://seogenesis.com/seo-tips/google-owning-the-mobile-market-317/</link>
		<comments>http://seogenesis.com/seo-tips/google-owning-the-mobile-market-317/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Masashi Murakami III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seo News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogenesis.com/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick blip of news that everyone should find interesting to know, Royal Pingdom is reporting that Google is the Champion of the Mobile Search. After a quick look at the below chart using Statcounter&#8217;s Global Stats, it certainly seems as though other companies are not even recognizing the mobile market as a market ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick blip of news that everyone should find interesting to know, <a href="http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/07/29/google-undisputed-heavyweight-champion-of-mobile-search/">Royal Pingdom is reporting</a> that Google is the <em>Champion of the Mobile Search</em>.  </p>
<p>After a quick look at the below chart using <a href="http://gs.statcounter.com/">Statcounter&#8217;s Global Stats</a>, it certainly seems as though other companies are not even recognizing the mobile market as a market at all:</p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.pingdom.com"><img src="http://seogenesis.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/GoogleDominatingMobileSearchMarket.png" alt="Google's Dominance in the Mobile Market" width="500" height="431" /></a></center></p>
<p>We at SEO Genesis of course know differently and with this news comes the preparation of how we will incorporate this information as a tool.
<ul class="check_list">
<li>How will your business factor in people using their Androids, iPhones, Blackberrys, and other &#8220;Smart&#8221; phones on a daily basis to receive information?
<li>How can you make sure you can be the one to provide the answers for the questions they ask?
<li>Will <a href="http://seogenesis.com/local-search/">local search</a> results be a higher value item within mobile searches versus on a computer?
</ul>
<p>Good questions to ponder over on a Friday morning, along with many more not even thought of as my morning coffee still has yet to settle in <img src='http://seogenesis.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seogenesis.com/seo-tips/google-owning-the-mobile-market-317/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Testing More Query Revisions</title>
		<link>http://seogenesis.com/seo-tips/google-query-revisions-114/</link>
		<comments>http://seogenesis.com/seo-tips/google-query-revisions-114/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seo News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogenesis.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google seems fascinated lately with query revisions. If you&#8217;re not sure what query revisions are, you&#8217;ve  probably run into them and just didn&#8217;t know exactly what happened. Think back to when you did a Google search and they showed you results for a different term then the one you searched for, then offered a hyperlink at the top ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google seems fascinated lately with query revisions. If you&#8217;re not sure what query revisions are, you&#8217;ve  probably run into them and just didn&#8217;t know exactly what happened. Think back to when you did a Google search and they showed you results for a different term then the one you searched for, then offered a hyperlink at the top of the results page that says &#8220;Showing Results for ______&#8221;, &#8220;Did You Mean ________?&#8221; Google is testing this and the results have been rather frustrating to searchers. Lets be happy they at least see the need to continue to test this. Here is a typical example.</p>
<p>I searched for:<br />
blue widgets.</p>
<p>And I got:<br />
Here is the search for red widgets. Did you mean to search for blue widgets?<br />
Yes, actually, I did mean to search for blue widgets. I clicked on the search for blue widgets.</p>
<p>And I got:<br />
Here is the search for blue wadgets. Did you mean to search for blue widgets?<br />
Yes, as a matter of fact, that&#8217;s why I typed it in in the first place. So I clicked on the search for blue widgets yet again.</p>
<p>And got:<br />
Here is the search for blue widgets..<br />
Oh, happy day. But wait &#8211; there in the last position I saw that Google had slipped in a page about blue wadgets after all. As if I couldn&#8217;t really be serious about wanting to search for blue widgets.</p>
<p>I searched for:<br />
blue widgets -wadgets.</p>
<p>And got:<br />
A search for blue widgets with a page about red widgets somewhere around the bottom of the page.</p>
<p>I then search for:<br />
blue widgets -wadgets -red.</p>
<p>And finally am looking at search results I had hoped to get in the first place.</p>
<div>As you can see there is still a lot of improvement needed in the part of Google with this. Lets hope they figure it out soon or turn it off.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seogenesis.com/seo-tips/google-query-revisions-114/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

